Home arrow Forum arrow DVD Rip arrow DivX / XviD arrow Video Quality: Xvid vs Nero digital
Video Quality: Xvid vs Nero digital
November 20, 2008, 11:56:34 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1]
« previous next »
  Print  
Author Topic: Video Quality: Xvid vs Nero digital  (Read 1582 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
pray4all
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2


View Profile
« on: February 11, 2007, 11:51:09 AM »
Newbie Q:

How does video quality compare between Nero digital and xvid(using autoGK)?

Nero seems to be really fast with good quality

Autogk is slower, but is it better quality? (assume the same bitrate)

Thanks
Logged
bT
Global Moderator
Experienced Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 130


View Profile WWW
« Reply #1 on: February 11, 2007, 03:08:47 PM »
Nero may be better at lower bitrates compared to XviD.
But my fave is XviD..
Logged
bT
pray4all
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: February 11, 2007, 10:40:34 PM »
Thanks.
Just did some experiment..

on my Core 2 duo 2GHz laptop, Nero Digital takes 40 mins to two-pass a DVD (down to 600kbps rate)

using autogk, it takes 2hr and 50 mins for the same DVD and bitrate.. Geez.... and the sound is delayed...what's up with that?

For my untrained eyes, the nero quality seems no worse if not better than xvid..

I guess i will stay with Nero....
Logged
Pages: [1]
  Print  
DVD-Guides.com Forum > DVD Rip > DivX / XviD > Topic: Video Quality: Xvid vs Nero digital
 « previous next »
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.7 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.092 seconds with 17 queries.